On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:45:32AM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> First off, I'm actually finding the time to do the sky-castle work. The
> releng critpath script now outputs critpath data by group:
> https://pagure.io/releng/c/621caa542acc142d57f1247e7644846f737f8eee?branch=main
> 
> Bodhi (git HEAD Bodhi, anyway) can now read data in that format:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4755
> 
> and when this PR is merged, it will be able to mark updates as critpath
> by groups:
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4759

Nice!

> Second, since nobody really opposed the idea of extending the critpath
> definition slightly, here's a formal proposal to implement that. I want
> to edit the wiki critpath page:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package
> 
> and change it as follows:
> 
> 1. Under Background, change "The packages required to sustain these
> actions make up the critical path." to:
> 
> "The packages required to sustain these actions initially made up the
> critical path. Later, it was agreed that the maintainers of Editions,
> spins, and labs can also declare packages that provide other key
> functionality to be part of the ''critical path'' for that Edition,
> spin or lab."
> 
> 2. Under Actions, change the first two sentences to read:
> 
> "Packages required to perform the most fundamental actions on a system
> are always considered part of the ''critical path''. Those actions
> include: "

+1.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to