> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 10:59 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 
> I hadn't considered the container case at all, that containers running
> systemd-journald would have their own journals and retention policy. I wonder 
> if the
> container default should have volatile journals? Or forward the journals to 
> the host by
> default? But yes I can see how many containers each thinking they have a 4G 
> cap could
> quickly become a problem.

To be fair, my situation might be a bit unorthodox. These systemd-nspawn 
containers were created using `dnf --installroot ...` (the sort of method 
documented here: 
http://0pointer.net/blog/systemd-for-administrators-part-xxi.html). And some of 
them were created by copying the root filesystems of what were formerly qemu 
virtual machines. I'm not sure how common that sort of thing is for people to 
do. As long as it is easy for admins to tweak things for their use case, it 
might not be something that really needs a special default.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to