Hi, On Thursday, 2022-09-08 00:59:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Sandro wrote: > > Mozilla's blog entry doesn't substantiate the claim and the linked bug > > report[1] is not publicly accessible. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784838 > > The best way then would be to check whether the one-line fix: > https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/log?rev=1784838 > applies (and compiles), and if it does, apply it. > > Though it is moot anyway because Fedora has already been upgraded to > Thunderbird 102.2.1. But backporting security fixes should have been > considered as an option. I get the impression that it was not even > considered. This misses the point. Here everyone is talking about the fix in 102.2.1, but that is moot anyway because there was an upgrade/rebase to 102.2.0 already a week earlier. Eike -- GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
