On Mon, 2022-08-29 at 10:53 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 9:53 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > <bexel...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I wonder if we should take another approach here. Assuming no serious bugs > > in dnf, rather than tuning dnf for low memory environments could we suggest > > those folks use Fedora Silverblue, CoreOS, or IoT? > > Just speaking for myself: I have Fedora installations on 1G RAM VM > servers that I've been upgrading for many years now, and they just > keep chugging along as of Fedora 35. If I would need to either 1) pay > twice the money per month to keep this setup, or 2) spend a few days > reprovisioning the servers with Fedora CoreOS 36 (assuming it doesn't > suffer from the same problem), then I'd consider neither of these > options a desirable outcome.
There *is* a workaround, BTW - I didn't mention this in my original mail, and probably should have. At least according to discussion in the bug, microdnf works OK. So you can use that instead. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
