On 8/21/22 12:51, John Reiser wrote: >> it's clear there's a documentation problem [with DT_GNU_HASH] > Partly due to lack of documentation, already I have seen "abuses" > of the DT_GNU_HASH format. In particular, some versions of Rust > and/or musl run-times use (0 == nbucket) to mean something like > "there is no hash table information" but do not specify all the > implications for the run-time symbol table. Other versions use > (1 == nbucket && 0 == buckets[0] && 1 == n_bitmask && 0 == bitmask[0]) > for a similar purpose. Similarly, Rust and Android can trim > "unused" zero entries from the end of &hash_array[nbucket], > even though buckets[] and hash_array[] should be parallel.
Please report a bug at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
