Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 11:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Because it's NOT a bug in glibc, because what glibc does is CORRECT,
>> because it actually POINTS OUT bugs in applications which are
>> portability issues and can hurt future optimization opportunities
>> (regardless of whether the current implementation really is faster
>> than before or not)
>
> Which it isn't.
On some hardware, it is. It wouldn't have been committed if it hadn't been
benchmarked to be a win.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
