On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 1:43 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > >> As I already mentioned the last time this has come up: Why can we not, > >> instead of chainloading Windows directly, chainload a systemd-boot > >> configured to always bootnext to Windows? > > > > Pretty sure shim still hard codes the name grub$arch.efi as the 2nd > > bootloader. Hence having to rename sd-boot as grubx64.efi for shim to find > > and run it. They can't co-exist right now. Also, there's no current plan > > by anyone to add systemd-boot for Secure Boot signing. > > That is not what I suggested. > > I suggested shim → GRUB → systemd-boot → Windows (and shim → GRUB → Fedora, > systemd-boot would be configured to always reboot to Windows, booting Fedora > from GRUB would bypass it entirely), not shim → systemd-boot → Windows. >
That may work indeed, but we'd need to ensure it can't be used as a stage-two bootloader somehow. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
