On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 21:55 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:47 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On 25. 07. 22 23:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 08:57:39AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Per the Fedora 37 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for
> > Fedora
> > >> 37 on 2022/07/20. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 37 for:
> > >>
> > >> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
> > >>
> > >> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f37-rebuild) and moved
> > over to
> > >> f37. Failures can be seen
> > >>
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f37-failures.html 
> > Things
> > >> still needing rebuilding
> > >>
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f37-need-rebuild.html
> > > I could be being stupid here, but what's the difference between
> > > packages that failed to build and packages that need rebuilding?
> > 
> > Considering "need-rebuild" is a superset of "failures" (I've just
> > checked [1]) 
> > the 2 differences I can think of are:
> > 
> > 1) Only builds that manage to get past buildSRPMFromSCM are
> > associated to the 
> > particular package by Koji. Hence, packages that failed
> > buildSRPMFromSCM or 
> > when the Koji build was not even submitted (i.e. there was no spec
> > file, 
> > missing source, RPM parse error, noautobuild file, etc.) -- such
> > package swill 
> > onyl be listed in "need-rebuild" as there is no known associated
> > build failure 
> > with them.
> > 
> 
> 
> Exactly, almost all of the packages for me are not direct failures,
> but related to vtk not building (and probably cascades down from
> there but I stopped drilling down).


I already did one PR to fix the this (vtk) issue  

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104097


> A couple are due to libusb-devel being retired. I'm surprised there
> weren't bugs already filed for that. I would think detecting packages
> using retired dependencies would be somewhat trivial to discover.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to