> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:37 PM Vipul Siddharth
> <siddharthvipul1(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Given that flathub provides similar / overlapping content compared to
> RPMFusion (or often, even more "legally problematic" than what's
> available from RPMFusion, i.e. prebuilt blobs), doesn't this same
> reasoning also apply there? I.e. can Fedora enable the full rpmfusion
> repositories by default, as well, instead of only the separate
> ("filtered") repositories for the proprietary NVidia drivers and the
> Steam client?
Note that the proposal is not about enabling Flathub, only about its filtering.
As far as I understand it remains off by default.
But RPMfusion was my first thought , too. We don't even ship the repo
definitions, do we, and enabling "third party software" in Gnome software
center does not enable RPMfusion. Why not?
My second thought was about packaging. Why should I inverst my free time into
rpm packaging, especially unbundling, caring about dependent packages etc. -
i.e. evreything which makes a distro a distro - when the preferred "packaging"
switches to flatpaks?
"Additionally, the filtered Flathub has not been popular with users.
[...]
Dropping the filter will resolve this criticism."
While we do our packaging work *for* the users, that argument really doesn't
convice me. Give them "curl | sudo sh" because it's so simple and provides more
applications? Let npm and cargo and pip install right into /usr? Much easier
and so many apps! What could go wrong?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
