Its stock configure script, that tries to test-compile conftest.c fails thusly:
gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches - pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,- D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack- protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 - m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection - fcf-protection -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now - specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld - specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -Wl,- dT,/builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-courier- unicode-2.2.3.20220416-1.fc36.x86_64.ld conftest.c >&5
/usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-courier- unicode-2.2.3.20220416-1.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory
Looking at the output of rpm -q --showrc, this is apparently coming from a bunch of _package_note macros, including a -Wl,-dT flag that's referencing this .ld file that's nowhere to be found.
I can't immediately make heads or tails of these new macros, anyone know what this is all about, and what's missing from the spec file? Randomly, I added
%{_generate_package_note_file}
after %setup, in %prep, and that seem to get passed this error, is this
really needed in every package that runs the linker?
pgpHeYI4KpJ9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
