Adam Williamson wrote:
> Right now it's not entirely clear whether this is considered part of
> the Change scope or not. The paragraph about the `uvesafb` driver seems
> kind of aspirational and doesn't seem to commit to anything. The
> "Benefit to Fedora" section states "Verified modern supported paths for
> cases currently handled by vesa/fbdev", but I'm not 100% clear what is
> meant by that.
IMHO, it is not acceptable to remove the vesa driver without having
something like uvesafb to replace it.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
