On 14.4.2022 11:53, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 14.04.2022 um 12:57 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johan...@gmail.com>:
For example EU has regulation that requires vendors to have spare parts
available for 7–10 years after date of manufacturing so it makes sense for the
project to support hw no longer than a decade from the date of it's
manufacturing. ( which makes the oldest hw being support being manufactured in
2012 ) and every process,workflows and decision being bound by that.
Is Fedora an distribution that does not revert but always transforms, rolls out
and moves forward or is it an distribution that is stuck in the past ( from a
software and hardware point of view )?
Sorry, you simple didn’t get the point. It is not just about hardware. Some
Cloud providers doesn’t support UEFI boot at the moment - so said various
voices from Cloud WG. And some data center insist ob BIOS boot because of
whatever, presumably management infrastructure. So, the hardware does or does
not support UEFI, doesn’t matter in these cases.
So you are saying that 3rd party vendors ( cloud providers ) now dictate
and decide the direction of the project?
JBG
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
