On 11/12/2010 11:46 AM, Chris Lumens wrote: >> * btrfs (Is this ready to be default? :) If so, would that warrant a >> change in our lvm by default setup? > I don't think we are quite ready for this yet. I do have "btrfs > strategy" on my todo list, though. I'm hoping we can start talking at > FUDCon about what we want btrfs to do for us, possibly taking the place > of LVM. > > - Chris
We have been spending a lot of time and thought trying to scheme about how to accelerate btrfs. At this point, it is actually fairly stable but still missing key things (most notably a fsck that can fix the file system!). Last week at plumbers, we did get a large chunk of the btrfs developers together for a few hours and have been working to make sure that we have sufficient people working to get this done... Ric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
