Kamil Dudka <kdu...@redhat.com> writes: > On Friday, April 1, 2022 12:51:36 PM CEST Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> - check whether the "new object name" is descendant of >> (contains) "old build object name" (rather than "old object name", which >> would forbid any force push) >> This would allow to rewrite a branch as long as the last commit hasn't been >> built yet (but allow only rewrites to commits since the last build). In >> particular, this would allow to avoid the many "commit missing patch", >> "actually commit the change", "duh" commits which happen after a successful >> `fedpkg build --scratch --srpm` followed by a half-(how do you say this >> nicely)ed commit. > > I thought the plan was to use pull requests with some CI checks to > avoid this.
I hope not. Unless merging the PRs and kicking off the builds are done automatically, this'll just be as painful as the current centos workflow: - commit - push to fork - open PR - wait for checks - click "merge" button - wait for bots - kick off build compared with: - fedpkg commit -sc && fedpkg push && fedpkg build Context switches for maintainers are expensive! And while I don't personally think the "oops fixup" commits are a problem, a "PR with CI" workflow doesn't get rid of them by any means. Be well, --Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
