Adam Williamson wrote:
> In point of fact, no. Nobody can. It needs either more positive karma
> or two more days in testing, under the policy. As I said, the automated
> test failure is irrelevant to this.

Actually, this is not a critical path package (or the minimum timeout would 
be 2 weeks, not 1), so the stable threshold could be lowered to 1, then the 
update can be pushed.

In fact, I think I could even technically do that (both lower the threshold 
and queue the package for stable) as a provenpackager, but I do not want to 
overrule the maintainer.

That said, I am still not convinced that it is a good idea that critical 
security updates (and other urgent updates, such as, e.g., regression fixes) 
cannot be pushed directly to stable without any karma requirement at all as 
was the case a (sadly) long time ago. (I have been trying without success to 
get this decision overturned ever since.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to