On 3/11/22 13:33, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:07 PM Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:23:41 -0600, >> Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01 -0600, >>> >>> The Fedora 36 beta is likely to slip because firefox was not building >>> successfully on i686, but was on other arches. >> >> It is actually more complicated than I remembered. Firefox needed a gcc fix, >> but gcc building is blocked on an i686 issue. And the delay in getting >> that fix combined with the long time for doing a gcc build is seemingly >> going to result in a slip because a firefox downgrade (from the f35 version) >> would cause problems for some testers. > > So ... this sounds like firefox would be a good example of a package > that would benefit from my proposal?
It would be, yes. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
