> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/polkit_recommends_pkla_pkexec
> See in progress PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/polkit/pull-request/2 From a comment in the PR: > IMHO making polkit-pkla-compat optional is seriously risky. The > configuration can contain “if user=foo deny” entries, and silently > ignoring those configuration files can break the security of the > system. If polkit indeed treats rules it doesn't have currently support for as always satisfied, I would treat this is a blocker for splitting out polkit-pkla-compat. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
