On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 09:15, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 22:45, Ron Olson <tachokni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I’m troubleshooting an issue and came up with this sample program: > > https://pastebin.com/g9S8Z64q to demonstrate the problem.
That's not a valid C++ program, even in C++23 after <stdatomic.h> is added. For C++23 it needs to be _Atomic(int) because in C++ _Atomic is not a type qualifier (unlike in C). Clang supports the _Atomic qualifier in C++ mode, but that's non-standard. This code is not portable to any compiler except Clang, and is no longer even portable to Clang when using G++ in C++23 mode. I suppose we could enable the contents of <stdatomic.h> for the non-strict -std=gnu++XX modes before C++23, but you'd still need to adjust your program to use _Atomic(int) instead of _Atomic int. Why not just write it in proper C++, using std::atomic<int> or the atomic_int typedef instead? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
