On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092 > > This is not about the feature itself but about the way it has been > implemented. > > During builds LDFLAGS is modified so it contains a build path, > something like: > > > -Wl,-dT,/builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-rubygem-nio4r-2.5.2-6.fc36.x86_64.ld > > Many builds embed/store LDFLAGS somewhere. For OCaml it gets embedded > in the ocamlopt binary, and in *.cma files. Similar sort of thing > happening in Ruby, Perl, Haskell, Python, ...
Also R, which breaks R packages. Tom disabled this feature in the spec for the time being. > But the problem is more general than this too. It also turns up in > some *.pc (pkgconf) files. > > I think this change should be reverted until a cleaner way can be > found to implement it. I agree. Switching to %extension_*flags has been proposed, as Python does, but there was a system-wide change for that [1], and now we are asked to switch everything to using this without pondering the consequences because this change overlooked its consequences. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_Extension_Flags -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
