On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 16:23, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Dne 26. 01. 22 v 15:48 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a): > > On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> More issues with this change: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246 > >> > >> Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the > >> build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With > >> this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build > >> stage is injected, and basically extensions are broken. I consider > >> this a bug in rpm-config-macros. If later-non-valid flags are required > > I meant redhat-rpm-config, apologies. > > > This is basically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092.
Ouch, what a mess... > I'd suggest to build R and similar with: > > ~~~ > > %undefine _package_note_file > > ~~~ > > > as a quick workaround and find better solution later. E.g. there is this > proposal for Ruby: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684#c14 I see that the use of %{extension_*flags} is suggested. Are these safe to use in EPEL? -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
