On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 08:50 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24 2022 at 03:19:00 PM -0800, Adam Williamson > <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > I do hope this can be cleaned up soon. Dropping arches from packages > > is > > a very big hammer and should be wielded extremely sparingly. Unless > > ceph was unusable without a rebuild on the other arches, it would've > > been better to wait until this issue was resolved before rebuilding > > ceph. > > Hi, until the toolchain is fixed, the only options are ExcludeArch: > ppc64le or just stop doing work in rawhide. I decided to leave > rawhide's WebKitGTK vulnerable to the worst security issue we've seen > in years [1] rather than exclude ppc64le, because removing WebKitGTK it > would take out the entire desktop on ppc64le, and I trust our GCC > maintainers are working to fix ppc64le expeditiously, but I totally > understand other maintainers aren't so willing to wait. It will be easy > to reenable ceph for ppc64le once GCC is working again.
Well, the consequence of making that choice in this case was to prevent *other people* from doing work in Rawhide (unless they also disable ppc64le, which I don't want to do since we do actually *use* os- autoinst on ppc64le), so it doesn't seem like a straightforward one :D -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
