On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jiri Konecny <jkone...@redhat.com> wrote: >
(snip) > > I really can't blame the people. Not everyone has the week of time to > package all the dependencies > one by one. But COPR is a nice shortcut to that so I can have what the > upstream is producing > without spending so much time and just re-using binaries produced > upstream. The same works for > pinging people to update their packages. On the other hand ... if you don't have the time to properly maintain a package, maybe you shouldn't push it to the official Fedora repositories at all? This only results in the worst outcome: Frustration for the packager (don't have time to properly update) *and* users (package in Fedora is out of date). Pushing things in a not-entirely-packaging-guidelines-compliant-but-maintainable-with-limited-time form to COPR would be a way better solution here from the start. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
