On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Also please realise that the community can eat only so many changes per > release no matter how much you want to otherwise. You can probably get this > OR the fs-verity in some future release, but not both in the same release > and trying to fight for both is going to mean you get neither. In fact, at > a certain point too many changes start making it that any CR with certain > names attached will get derailed because people are sure there is some sort > of agenda or conspiracy which they have to fight to stop.
I'm not sure I understand this point. Chris is proposing this change, and Neal and I listed because I volunteered to help him implement some of the changes. And Chris is not on the fs-verity change, and neither is Neal. I do hope everyone give each other the benefit of the doubt and not jump to assuming there is a secret agenda or conspiracy afoot -- I see this raised against the DIGLIM proposal too, at least once -- but if it helps make it clear that there is no agenda being pushed, I'll take my name off this change so there is no confusion. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
