On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:44 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 27 2021 at 11:04:01 PM -0800, Adam Williamson
> <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > For me this seems like kind of a non-starter unless these are merged
> > upstream. I do not think it makes sense for Fedora to carry these
> > patches downstream long-term. If this is a good implementation of a
> > good feature, it should be merged upstream. If it isn't, we shouldn't
> > carry it downstream.
>
> Yeah let's start by getting the code upstream, that would be step one
> before proposing a Fedora change proposal.
>

I'm fine with the Change proposal being made, as it gives us a
holistic view of things. We can always pre-condition it on the code
being upstreamed and then proceed with the rest of the enablement.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to