On 12/3/21 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Seehttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/
Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have
any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve
deps)?
I think that would increase the size of the primary repodata...
I guess by number * length of obsolete, so might not be that bad?
It would likely affect dnf processing time as well, but not sure how
much.
It seems like something to try and avoid if possible.
kevin
Hi,
point taken. I've checked with the dnf team as well, and they're of the
same opinion. So we won't be turning on the automatic Obsoletes in
Fedora, only in ELN.
Thanks for the feedback!
Tomáš
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
