On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 08:53 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 12/12/21 06:21 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > 
> > > I also noticed that python3-wxpython4 appears to require the 3.0
> > > branch, so that might be what is causing both 3.0 and 3.1 of wxGTK
> > > to be dragged in:
> > > 
> > > $ rpm -q --requires python3-wxpython4
> > > ...
> > > libwx_baseu-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Is there a version of python3-wxpython4 that uses 3.1?  I really
> > > don't want both wxGTK versions in the build.
> > 
> > Yes, there is.  However, the latest version bundles its own non-
> > release copy of wxWidgets, and I don't believe it can be (easily)
> > built unbundled with the current release of wxWidgets 3.1.  So that's
> > why I have been holding off packaging it.  That, plus the 3.1.x
> > variant of wxWidgets is a development release and not API/ABI
> > stable.  Perhaps it's worth reconsidering if there's a new release of
> > wxPython that can use the latest released wxWidgets 3.1.x.
> 
> Thanks very much for the reply, Scott.
> 
> I'm not sure how critical it is to KiCad to make the switch, but I'll
> ask.  I believe that the KiCad Mac, Windows, and Flatpack builds have
> already made the switch, but I don't know if the KiCad team make their
> own builds of wxWidgets / wxpython.
> 
> Do you have a feel for when the 3.1 branch might stabilize enough to
> create a Fedora package?

BTW from this thread
https://sourceforge.net/p/dvdstyler/discussion/318795/thread/b40e1d871f/#84aa

wxWidgets 3.1 isn't available in many distributions (debian, Ubuntu,
archlinux, gentoo) and will never be packaged because 3.1 is a
development version...

https://trac.wxwidgets.org/wiki/Roadmap 

Best regards, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to