On 11/29/21 15:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 29/11/2021 14:22, Jun Aruga wrote:
You can use `%bcond_with foo` (foo is not set as "false") or
`%bcond_without foo` (foo is set as "true") syntax.
%bcond_with{,out} has very ugly reverse syntax. I recently got rid of
them in all my packages.
Yes it confuses a lot of people. However they are widely used and thus
impossible to change, so its just better get used to it. The trick is to
remember that
%bond_with / %bcond_without are macros to *add an option build
with or without* a capability, respectively.
That adding such an option effectively also defines a default which is
reverse of the macro added is merely a side-effect.
It's perhaps a strange way to approach the problem, but these are old
old macros (from 2004), I think PLD was way ahead of others in utilizing
rpm macros etc for general distro benefit.
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
