* Aleksei Bavshin:

> On 11/4/21 09:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Why is this VERIFY?  The patch was generated as if by “git show”, and I
>> do not see anything wrong with it.
>
> rpminspect thinks that the patch is suspiciously large and asks you to
> confirm that it is intentional.
>
> There's a test description in the beginning of the log:
>
> Inspects all patches defined in the spec file and reports changes
> between builds.  At the INFO level, rpminspect reports diffstat(1) and 
> patch size changes.  If thresholds are reached regarding a change in
> the patch size or the number of files the patch touches, rpminspect
> reports the change at the VERIFY level unless the comparison is for a
> rebase. The configuration file can also list patch names that
> rpminspect should ignore during the inspection.

Is this a new check?  It was flagged as a regression in Jenkins.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to