Sérgio Basto wrote on 2021/11/03 0:59:
Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231

or maybe we should request help of an proven packager

Thank you



On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:02 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 10:44 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
<l...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

Hello team,

ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
35-build-side-47231.

Sorry, I am confused. Did you mean to say the update and rebuilds for
rawhide are *finished* and you're starting the process for f35 now?

yes, we are asking to build all packages for F35 in f35-build-side-
47231

I did it for dvdauthor

cd ../dvdauthor
git pull
git checkout f35
git merge rawhide
git push
fedpkg build --target=f35-build-side-47231

Thank you

Otherwise, the side tag name does not match "updated [...] on Rawhide
and got side tag as [f]35-build-side-xxxxx".

For my understanding, the following packages
(including those from RPM Fusion) may need a rebuild based on these
dependencies:

`dnf repoquery  --whatrequires "libMagick*" --qf "%{reponame}
%{sourcerpm}" -q | sed 's/updates/fedora/' | pkgname | sort -u`

fedora autotrace
fedora chafa
fedora converseen
fedora digikam
fedora dmtx-utils
fedora dvdauthor
fedora eom
fedora ImageMagick
fedora kxstitch
fedora pfstools
fedora php-pecl-imagick
fedora psiconv
fedora q
fedora R-magick
fedora rss-glx
fedora rubygem-rmagick
fedora synfig
fedora synfigstudio
fedora vdr-scraper2vdr
fedora vdr-skinelchihd
fedora vdr-skinnopacity
fedora vdr-tvguide
fedora vips
fedora WindowMaker
rpmfusion-free libopenshot
rpmfusion-free xine-lib

Please use f35-build-side-47231 side-tag to build your package, and
I
(or my co-maintainer) am intending to merge in F35 repository in
about a
week.

Given that Fedora 35 is now officially *stable*, and ImageMagick not
being a leaf package, such a disruptive update would require FESCo
exception to the Updates Policy.
If you want to file a ticket for such an exception, it would be great
if people could verify that this is actually the *complete* list of
packages that need to be rebuilt (and that they indeed *can* be
rebuilt without issues on F35), so that there is no negative fallout
from broken dependencies on a stable release.

Fabio

All the above packages on Fedora are now rebuilt:

 for f in ImageMagick-libs ImageMagick-c++ ; do dnf repoquery --quiet 
--repo=koji-35-build-side-47231 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires $f ; done | 
sort -f | uniq | cat -n
     1  autotrace-0.31.1-62.fc35.src.rpm
     2  chafa-1.2.1-6.fc35.src.rpm
     3  converseen-0.9.9.2-2.fc35.src.rpm
     4  digikam-7.3.0-2.fc35.src.rpm
     5  dmtx-utils-0.7.6-9.fc35.1.src.rpm
     6  dvdauthor-0.7.2-16.fc35.src.rpm
     7  eom-1.26.0-2.fc35.src.rpm
     8  ImageMagick-6.9.12.28-1.fc35.src.rpm
     9  kxstitch-2.1.1-6.fc35.src.rpm
    10  php-pecl-imagick-3.5.1-2.fc35.src.rpm
    11  psiconv-0.9.8-36.fc35.src.rpm
    12  q-7.11-44.fc35.src.rpm
    13  R-magick-2.7.3-2.fc35.src.rpm
    14  rss-glx-0.9.1.p-50.fc35.src.rpm
    15  rubygem-rmagick-4.2.3-3.fc35.src.rpm
    16  synfig-1.4.0-4.fc35.src.rpm
    17  synfigstudio-1.4.0-3.fc35.src.rpm
    18  vdr-scraper2vdr-1.0.11-14.20190128gitd9f6cb4.fc35.1.src.rpm
    19  vdr-skinelchihd-0.5.0-7.fc35.src.rpm
    20  vdr-skinnopacity-1.1.8-3.fc35.src.rpm
    21  vdr-tvguide-1.3.5-3.fc35.src.rpm
    22  vips-8.11.3-6.fc35.src.rpm
    23  WindowMaker-0.95.9-7.fc35.src.rpm

and also pfstools-2.1.0-21.fc35 is rebuilt.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=47231&order=-completion_time&latest=1

Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to