On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:45 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:09 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 21 2021 at 06:25:58 PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro > > <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > I'll probably add an ExcludeArch and leave it for 32-bit users to > > > deal with. > > > > OK, in conclusion, this is what I wound up doing. > > > > Unfortunately, the armv7hl build has started failing with the same > > problem, even though it was working fine last week, so I'm going to > > ExcludeArch that too. This is more significant because we produce > > actual ARM images, so this is going to have a much bigger impact beyond > > multilib and is fairly likely to take out something that is needed for > > the ARM images. I can't think of anything else to try in order to avoid > > this outcome, though, so I think 32-bit people will just need to get > > comfortable with revising dependencies to avoid WebKit. Sorry.... > > > > Note that aarch64 is still perfectly fine, so this will have no impact > > there. > > This is extremely unfortunate. > > While I appreciate that getting webkit updates out to users is > important, this gives package maintainers and release engineering very > little time to react. > I assume many rawhide deliverables will start to fail because of the > missing webkit2gtk3 packages after that last build finishes (if it > succeeds). > > I initially suggested making this a F36 System-Wide Change for a > reason, at least on paper or after the fact - to give people at least > *some* advance warning and allow for coordinated action around the > package removal on 32-bit arches ... For example, will this mean > Fedora can no longer produce Workstation (or other Spins) images for > arm, (given that e.g. gnome-shell transitively depends on > webkit2gtk3)? > I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately and do a system wide change proposal instead. The net effect of dropping webkitgtk is that all of GNOME packages will have to excludearch i686 and arm, as they are going to be unbuildable otherwise. (I am just objecting to the way this change is done and how it has ripple effects to hundreds of packages I maintain. I would _not_ object to dropping i686 and 32 bit arm from koji in a coordinated fashion.) Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
