Hello.
Rpmlint on Fedora 35 includes strange E: shlib-policy-name-error and E:
invalid-ldconfig-symlink checks. It complains about most of the built
RPM packages.
Upstream bug report:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/718
Example RPM:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/kimageannotator/0.5.2/1.fc35/x86_64/kimageannotator-0.5.2-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
Fedora 34 with rpmlint 1.11-19.fc34:
$ rpmlint kimageannotator-0.5.2-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Fedora 35 with rpmlint 2.1.0-4.fc35:
$ rpmlint kimageannotator-0.5.2-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
=========================================== rpmlint session starts
===========================================
rpmlint: 2.1.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 1
kimageannotator.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 0
kimageannotator.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink
/usr/lib64/libkImageAnnotator.so.0.5.2 libkImageAnnotator.so.0.5.2
=========== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 2
badness; has taken 21.4 s ============
Let's unpack RPM and test this manually:
$ objdump -p libkImageAnnotator.so.0.5.2 | grep SONAME
SONAME libkImageAnnotator.so.0
SOVERSION is 0 and 0.5.2 is just a symbolic link.
By the way, SOVERSION can consist of more than one digit. It can be
0.5.2 and this is not an error:
https://autotools.io/libtool/version.html
I think these checks are bogus and should be removed.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
