Hi,
On 8/17/21 2:06 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jeremy Linton:
That said, there as you mention various rpm/package build/etc problems
caused by `uname -m` returning armv8.
Is this something that can be changed with setarch? It works on other
architectures (at least on x86 and POWER).
Beyond the defaults? I don't know how to pull that off. You get three
differing unames on a armv8 machine that supports aarch64 and aarch32.
32-bit kernel armv7l
64-bit kernel 64-bit process, aarch64
64-bit kernel 32-bit process (or via setarch), armv8l
Trying to force the 64-bit kernel to armv7l via compat/etc just results
in the armv8 moniker. This is probably fixable/etc, or there is a way I
don't know about off hand.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
