I'm building some minimal images with mkosi, and I was working on a
pull request to add a "package manifest", i.e. a dump of all packages,
and I noticed that archful packages which were rebuilt with no changes
between F34 and rawhide have almost all gotten smaller:

-SourcePackage: acl-2.3.1-1.fc34.src.rpm
+SourcePackage: acl-2.3.1-2.fc35.src.rpm
 Packages:      acl libacl
-Size:          255585
+Size:          254969

-SourcePackage: audit-3.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm
+SourcePackage: audit-3.0.3-2.fc35.src.rpm
 Packages:      audit-libs
-Size:          303278
+Size:          303105

-SourcePackage: coreutils-8.32-30.fc34.src.rpm
+SourcePackage: coreutils-8.32-31.fc35.src.rpm
 Packages:      coreutils coreutils-common
-Size:          16941864
+Size:          16921108

-SourcePackage: dbus-broker-29-2.fc34.src.rpm
+SourcePackage: dbus-broker-29-3.fc35.src.rpm
 Packages:      dbus-broker
-Size:          396543
+Size:          396327

-SourcePackage: expat-2.4.1-1.fc34.src.rpm
+SourcePackage: expat-2.4.1-2.fc35.src.rpm
 Packages:      expat
-Size:          295609
+Size:          295041

...

This is the uncompressed size, so any differences in rpm compression
are not relevant. The binaries are smaller. Kudos to the compiler folks!

Zbyszek



P.S. Sadly, some of this is offset by new deps:

-SourcePackage: cracklib-2.9.6-25.fc34.src.rpm
-Packages:      cracklib
-Size:          251906
+SourcePackage: cracklib-2.9.6-26.fc35.src.rpm
+Packages:      cracklib cracklib-dicts
+Size:          10066620

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992607
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to