Hello Jerry,

On 8/4/21 3:57 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Am I stepping on your toes with this?  That is, had you already
started working on a v5 package?  I don't want to get in your way if
so.  On the other hand, if you haven't, would you like to comaintain
the one I'm working on?

No, I haven't, so feel free to continue.

Previous attempt to upgrade fontawesome wasn't successful (rhbz#1854348 if you haven't seen that already), so I was just trying to estimate the magnitude of disaster :)



Fabio (@fale) did the aforementioned upgrade and could be more inclined to comaintain fa5.


One potentially confusing thing is that FA5 consists of two fonts: Font
Awesome 5 Free and Font Awesome 5 Brands. fa-free-fonts could be
interpreted as containing only the former one.
Another is the whole parallel-installable thing and a need to guess
which package is 4 or 5 (and 6 in a not-so-distant future).

I'd suggest fontawesome5-fonts, or at least something with explicit
version in the package name.

Okay, that makes sense.  I guess that means that I didn't handle the
subpackages correctly, then.  I'll give this some thought.  Thanks for
the input!


--
With best regards,
Aleksei Bavshin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to