On 07. 07. 21 15:26, Peter Robinson wrote:
sugar-view-slides    callkalpa, chimosky, pbrobinson, tuxbrewr   Fedora 31
I believe the sugar people are working on that now.

As said last week:

"""
Fails to install, fails to build since Fedora 32, was exempted from this policy last time with a promise of a fix.

Has many bugzillas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=sugar-view-slides&product=Fedora
"""

I don't understand what is the benefit of keeping this broken package in the repos. Why don't we retire it and unretire it once actually fixed?

zram                 pbrobinson                                  Fedora 32
That's fixed.

I am confused. Fixed how exactly? As said last week:

"""
This might not actually be a FTBFS, but simply a package that has not been built in 1.5 years.
It has a noautobuild file with:

> it's a couple of bash scripts, no need for rebuilds

I tend to disagree with that statement. The rebuilds are useful for:

 - new possible dependency generators
 - new possible buildroot policy scripts
 - new RPM/buildsystem features (compression, content signatures, etc.)

I think it's worth rebuilding it at least once in a year.
"""

See the thread for reaction(s):

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/3RJHPPF66KQ4RPDHTADLKBJJLDW3CKE2/

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to