Since Fedora is also making the change, I'm wondering whether this voice should also be heard. They're assuming it's just GLib.
Carol On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:50:18AM -0400, Carol Bouchard wrote: > > Hi Daniel and other Fedora experts: > > > > I'm trying to get the m4 package to change their code. They're saying > this > > is not POSIX > > compliant change so they are resisting. See below snippet. I don't have > > the > > background to this change to answer their questions. Is someone with this > > background willing to jump onto the email thread to move forward with > this? > > Let me know and I'll add you to the thread. Also I told them it's not a > > glib > > change only that Fedora is also moving in this direction but my comments > > got lost in the thread. > > Looking at this thread: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-m4/2021-03/msg00000.html > > it appears that all the right people I'd expect are already involved > in the discussion from the GLibC / Gnulib side. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- > https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- > https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- > https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
