Actually yes, you are right. Currently all fedora prackages are buildable with autoconf-2.69 and there is a small part (~190), which are not buildable with autoconf-2.71 (will use compat package instead).
Thanks for your advice, I didn't realize this at the moment. Ondrej On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > Understand, starting to work on delivering autoconf-2.69 compat package. > > Have to investigate if it would be possible to install autoconf-2.69 and > > autoconf-2.71 next to each other on the system. Will keep you updated. > > Actually, it might not be necessary to have them parallel-installable. > If that is easy, then that's a nice property to have. But just being > able to install one or the other in mock is enough. > > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
