No, this is not true. DNS servers had for ages ability to forward selected domains to specified list of addresses. All DNS caches have the ability to do it for no reason.
Servers do not have automatic configuration of split DNS only, because often do not have multiple connections. But I think VPNs could be also used to interconnect networks and selected DNS forwarding might still be benefical for it. However, servers need a proper DNS service. Very often they depend on DNSSEC for mail filtering. They should protect their precious caches with signatures. DNSSEC disabled by default, even when upstream service provides perfectly working DNS, is just failure on our side. Especially on servers, when DNSSEC readines would be much more common than on crappy cheap home routers. Remote DNS does not have to be much slower. If you have dedicated resolver on the same LAN as you, your own cache might not help you much. Depends a lot on specific applications usage. On 2/25/21 4:42 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:51 am, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> Why do you think that? > > Servers don't need split DNS. Desktops do. Without a DNS cache, your DNS > will be slower. Without split DNS, your DNS may not work properly at all. -- Petr Menšík Software Engineer Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ email: pemen...@redhat.com PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
