On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 2:55 PM Tom Seewald <tseew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Under what criterion would it be a blocker? > > This affects (all?) users of Workstation running 34 or rawhide and causes > users to unsafely force power off their machine due to the 2 minute timeout. > Many will be led to think that their Fedora install or hardware is broken. > Shipping a release of Fedora Workstation that reboots without running into > major errors or timeouts by default seems reasonable to me. Why is this a bad > candidate for being a blocker?
I understand it's bad UI/UX and I agree. But what I'm asking is *what criterion*, i.e. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Beta_Release_Criteria https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Final_Release_Criteria Bugs don't become blockers only because they're nasty bugs, there's a process. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
