On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:19 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 20. 02. 21 10:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try > > to run: > > > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > > > ... > > > > Thank you > > > > P.S. sent from workstation successfully upgraded to F34 :) > > Awesome, I got just one issue with the vcmi package from rpmfusion, but a fix > is > pending testing \o/ > > But I guess many packages were not properly retired yet from Fedora 34: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10029#comment-716723 > > > P.S. Thanks for regurally staring this thread!
I concur, thanks for regularly doing this. Interestingly enough, I see a lot of package downgrades from up-to-date f33 to f34 (285 binary package downgrades, to be exact). (Yeah, I ran my handy script again). Some of those are probably down to either F34FTBFS or timing issues (updated builds getting pushed to f33 mirrors faster than to f34 mirrors). However, I suspect a lot of them are (again) caused by packagers missing the f34 branch point (sigh). Would people be interested in the concrete list of package downgrades? Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
