On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:14 AM Viktor Ashirov <vashi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow to >> launch applications? Recent article: >> >> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/ubuntu-core-20-adds-secure-boot-with-hardware-backed-encryption/ >> >> "in my experience, Fedora 32 is noticeably, demonstrably more sluggish >> to launch applications than Ubuntu is in general." >> >> Original article: >> >> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/05/linux-distro-review-fedora-workstation-32/ >> >> Would be good to know, for starters, whether this difference is real >> and measurable. > > This was bugging me for a while. I also noticed that Fedora 32 is a bit > slower than it used to be. Compilation time of a project that I'm working on > went from ~35-36 seconds to ~47-48. At first I thought that it's just another > round of CPU vulnerabilities mitigations that introduced a performance drop. > But after some digging I found that the default CPU governor was switched > from 'ondemand' to 'schedutil' in Fedora kernel 5.9.7: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/73c86ebaee23df8310b903c1dab2176d443f5a3a?branch=rawhide > (see configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL) > > I switched it back using cpupower from kernel-tools: > $ sudo cpupower frequency-set --governor ondemand > > And confirmed that my compilation time went back to the previous ~35 seconds. > In the end I switched the governor to 'performance' and shaved another 5 > seconds. And gnome-shell no longer feels sluggish, switching tabs in the > browser is also instant. > To make the change permanent I used settings in /etc/sysconfig/cpupower and > enabled cpupower service: > $ sudo systemctl enable --now cpupower.service > > The change of the default CPU governor looks pretty significant to me, but I > couldn't find any discussions about it.
CCing the Fedora kernel list and Justin. At the ARK tree level, the change was introduced in this commit, with no explanation: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/commit/9d69ad49ab90db607e25a99eacbf31dc9e513dfa Justin, do you remember the reason for the change? Can/should it be reverted? -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
