The Lazarus package currently builds three RPMs: "lazarus", which contains the 
IDE, and the "qt5pas" library, along with "qt5pas-devel".
qt5pas is, technically, a separate project with its own versioning - but since 
its distributed alongside Lazarus, and Lazarus depends on it, it made sense to 
build them from one SRPM.

In the spec, I specify a different Version: for qt5pas. This isn't a problem 
per-se, but means that if I upgrade Lazarus (so Version goes up and Release 
goes back to 1), I get a lower NVR for qt5pas. So I made a macro which gets 
calculated based on Lazarus's NVR, so it won't go down, and used it as the 
Release:. So now I have:
- in qt5pas: "Release = %{qt5pas-release}"
- in lazarus: "Requires: qt5pas = %{qt5pas-version}-%{qt5pas-release}"

Now, the problem is: whenever a Mass Rebuild occurs, the releng scripts see the 
"Release = %{qt5pas-release}" bit and just slap ".1" at the end, which in turn 
causes the "Requires: qt5pas = %{qt5pas-version}-%{qt5pas-release}" bit to be 
unsatisfiable.

While I could, obviously, just make a commit stripping the ".1" and rebuild the 
package, this approach is wasteful in regards to both my time and koji 
processing power, and unfriendly towards automation (as it means a mass rebuild 
will always produce broken packages). So I'm now wondering what would be the 
best approach.
- Move qt5pas to a separate dist-git repo: Would solve the problem above, but 
make syncing the packages harder.
- Drop the separate version for qt5pas and just use Lazarus's version (would 
need an Epoch bump, probably). This would make the package's version not match 
what is shipped.

Any other approach I could adopt?

Thanks in advance,
A.FI.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to