Fedora 34 mass rebuild of rpms is done and we started running the mass rebuild of modules. FTBFS tickets [0] are being filed now.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868278 On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Mohan Boddu <mbo...@bhujji.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:52 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Jonathan Wakely > > <jwak...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > > On 25/01/21 15:16 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > >On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:10 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > >> > We are delaying the mass rebuild by a day as of now due to bugs in > > > >> > gcc > > > >> > and dwz. As of now, we are expecting to start mass rebuild tomorrow, > > > >> > Jan 21st 2021. There is a new build of gcc running currently which > > > >> > has > > > >> > fixes to gcc bugs, but we are still figuring out the dwz fixes. We > > > >> > will keep you posted with any further developments. > > > >> > > > >> Both gcc-11.0.0-0.16.fc34 and dwz-0.13-6.fc34 with the fixes > > > >> are now in f34-build (and in eln-build too with s/fc34/eln108/). > > > >> Those who had their builds fail in the last 2 days because of s390x > > > >> rpm crashes, errors about strip failures of LTO debug sections or dwz > > > >> crashes can retry their builds, sorry for the inconvenience. > > > >> > > > >> AFAIK we are waiting now for boost and maybe binutils. > > > > > > > >boost 1.75 was merged yesterday, and binutils 2.36 was postponed to F35. > > > > (snip) > > > > > >I'm wondering something else: Will automation trigger a "second mass > > > >rebuild" for ELN once all the builds from the Fedora mass rebuild get > > > >tagged into f34? > > > >There's apparently issues with ELN right now, it looks like the base > > > >buildroot is not installable because boost 1.75 builds were done in > > > >the wrong order. > > > > > > Wrong in what way? > > > > Looks like this was a transient issue. koschei is no longer > > complaining about boost. > > The problem was some dependency chain involving rpm-build -> > > source-highlight -> boost 1.73, but it appears to have been a > > temporary problem, if it was a problem at all. > > Also, boost 1.75 builds were built in a side tag, when the side tag > was merged it didn't merge boost-1.75 properly and the eln builds > started using older boost, that also caused some issues with deps. > > > > > Fabio > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
