On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 01. 21 0:16, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM Fedora Rawhide Report > > <rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > Package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-6.fc34 > > > Old package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-5.fc33 > > > Summary: Library for writing Tor pluggable transports in Go > > > RPMs: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-devel > > > Size: 37.12 KiB > > > Size change: 129 B > > > Changelog: > > > * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering > > > <rel...@fedoraproject.org> - 1.1.0-6 > > > - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild > > > > What's going on here? This is one of a lot of packages that only have > > the mass rebuild changelog entry but no other changes, and have not > > been built by releng, but by other packagers, according to koji. > > Did people resubmit failed mass rebuild builds themselves (and not for > > f34-build)? I thought there's going to be an official second round of > > builds to weed out transient issues?
I'm not sure what happened there. resubmit should resubmit it just the way it was, ie, against f34-rebuild. A new build should get a new taskid, but this seemed to be the same one the releng one had. Dunno. Perhaps we could ask the people doing this? > > Yes and yes. Both can happen. Yeah, we are doing that now... the main rebuild finished, and all the failures were resubmitted. We hope to merge it in later today. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
