1) I see responses of Fedora long timers and I understand that you have polished workflows. But I really think that for newcomers, mock should be the preferred way. I'd love to see documentation adjusted to prefer mock everywhere.
2) I would really love you to stop using VMs for your build/testing. With exception of Kernel and Kernel related issues, the argument of "mock being slow" can't stand. Every VM will be more resources hungry then mock, slowing every your task.
3) The argument of mock being slow can't stand, because in one of my examples I posted elsewhere in this thread, I picked up the simplest package I could and the build took 7 seconds. This is certainly not slow, in this time you can't even switch to your email client to check your emails.
Vít Dne 27. 01. 21 v 17:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,I wonder, what would be the sentiment if I proposed to deprecated the `fedpkg local` command. I don't think it should be used. Mock should be the preferred way. Would there be anybody really missing this functionality?Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
