On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:47:07AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:06 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > > Adding normal packages are requirements for a devel package just to make > > it > > > multilib feels... unclean? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something. In > > order > > > to have the logic self-contained, why don't we add something like > > > "Provides: multilib(x86_64, i686)" into affected packages and make pungi > > > process that? > > > > Feel free to suggest it to rpm. ;) > > > > Why rpm? Isn't that entirely in our hands, what Provides we assign to > Fedora packages and what meaning we give it?
Sure I suppose... although it would be nice to coordinate with other rpm using distros. > > I'd personally just like to drop i686 entirely, but I don't think > > everyone else is ready for that. > > > > No no no, I'm not willing to give up my games collection! :-) See! :) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
