On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:45 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > It seems clear there's issues to address here before this change might > get approved. Here's my list: > Given the schedule, it seems like this should be retargeted for F35. I'm not sure if your list has that assumption in mind.
> * Get rpm updated at least in all Fedora's / active RHEL's to be able to > handle rpms with the signatures. I don't know how likely this is for > rhel7, but 8 and fedora 32 should hopefully not be hard. > I'm talking to the RHEL maintainers about getting this into RHEL 8. I don't want to make promises on their behalf, but I think we'll be okay in that regard. You're right that RHEL 7 seems very unlikely. If we consider it very critical, I can have that conversation, too. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
