On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:49 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone <jist...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >>> See also:
> > >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f86719df89eed587f6a?branch=master
> > >>
> > >> This is a blatant violation of Fedora packaging guidelines and ought to 
> > >> be
> > >> reverted immediately.
> > >>
> > >>         Kevin Kofler
>
> (snip)
>
> > > And where and how, precisely, does "rhel require this". Having the
> > > provenance of the source tarballs or git repos is wise and sensible,
> > > and random tarballs with no provenance are a problem for everybody, so
> > > that part is a good idea. But I'm not aware of it as a requirement. Is
> > > anyone else?
> >
> > It's a softer "requires", as in: RHEL is not shipping rust2rpm nor the
> > mass of rust-*-devel packages, so vendoring is the way.
>
> That might be so, but it's not a valid reason to build packages this
> way in fedora, where all the required dependencies should be present
> already.
> Additionally, missing instructions on how to build the "vendor"
> tarball, missing License information for the vendored crates, and
> missing "bundled()" provides are *definitely* against Packaging
> Guidelines.
>
> Fabio

I see a "Source1" tarball from github. If a github published archive
isn't reasonable for a Source tarball, there are a *lot* of other
.spec files that would need to be rejected.

Some of the other logic about this is peculiar, but that particular
"including a separate tarball" part looks  legal in and of itself. The
Samba and Subversion and Emacs SRPM's, for example, have included
separate tarballs for years.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to