On 1/20/21 9:29 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 20. 01. 21 17:21, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> >> On 1/20/21 9:17 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 20. 01. 21 17:03, Jeff Law wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/20/21 8:47 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>>>> On 20.01.2021 11:31, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>>>>> Right before the mass rebuild. Is this known? >>>>> >>>>> Fedora 34 will be built again with broken, full of regressions GCC >>>>> compiler (just like Fedora 32). >>>> Fix for this is already approved upstream and likely going into a new >>>> spin of gcc. >>>> >>>> FWIW, it's related to flipping to dwarf5. It doesn't affect code >>>> generation. >>> >>> Can we please check the impact of such changes in the future *before* >>> shipping them? >> Generally we do. If you were to look at the hundreds of fixes we've >> already made in F33 and F34, those are a direct result of doing our own >> test builds and fixing things we've found, either in the package or in >> gcc itself. > > Thanks! NP. It's good for Fedora and good for GCC as well.
> >> THe dwarf5 change went in very late upstream and thus wasn't subject to >> the continuous testing and fixing we've done. Sorry for that. > > I understand that stuff can break unexpectedly. Yea, the timing was awful. It didn't help that when I saw this yesterday in the tester I passed it along to Nick thinking it was actually a binutils problem. So we lost a fair amount of time because of that. jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
