* Tom Callaway: > Based on my (admittedly extremely limited) understanding of things, this > seems correct as > is: > > #if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__) > case __NR_newfstatat: // fstatat(). EPERM not a valid errno. > #elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__arm__) || \ > (defined(ARCH_CPU_MIPS_FAMILY) && defined(ARCH_CPU_32_BITS)) > case __NR_fstatat64: > #endif > > Is fstatat64 actually implemented on x86_64 now?
It's not. It may be a completely different system call. Is there a way to get logging of filtered system calls from the sandbox? > Alternately, if you'd prefer to simply open an upstream bug with > Google, just let me know. :) I want to be helpful here, but not waste > your time. It makes sense to do that anyway, to share information across distributions. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
